Archive for April, 2008

So do I look like this guy or not?

April 29, 2008

It happened again.  This time it was at the Waffle House across the street.  Last time it was in Walmart.  The time before that it was a hardware store, and before that at Papa Johns.

Now, I need some opinions here- do I really honestly look like this guy or not? Apparently he’s some NASCAR driver.  I don’t really give a rip about NASCAR- actually, I kind of think it sucks- but it’s really intriguing to me that people think I look like this guy (Matt Kenseth).  I don’t see it at all.. except that we’re both male and white. I just think I mostly look like myself.

Anyway, I demand opinions:

For those of you who don’t know me, you’ll have to be left out of this one- unless you fire up your cyber sleuthing skills and search for some pictures of me on the interweb somewhere. There are plenty to be found. I just refuse to post pictures of myself on my blog.

Planet Narnia

April 28, 2008

A new book on CS Lewis’ Narnia chronicles has come out, and unlike previous books, it seems this one may actually have something new, interesting, profitable, and most importantly, correct to say.

Check it out.

Having read the chronicles multiple times as well as being familiar with a large portion of Lewis’ other works, I have to say that my first impression of this idea of the the 7 heavens corresponding to the 7 books is that it is not only likely, but it would be just the sort of thing that Lewis would do. I plan to put this one on my summer reading list.

Here’s a clip from Hugh Hewitt’s show discussing the book- you have to click listen now and move the slider about halfway through to get to the interview.

The Dark Knight, The Joker, and no Katie Holmes

April 27, 2008

I loved Batman Begins- it was very well done, and gave the Batman franchise the rebirth it needed.

But I have to be honest- there was a major flaw in that flick.  That flaw’s name was Katie Holmes.  Now, I know that for many this is sacrilege- but let’s be honest here people.  She’s kind of odd looking for one thing.  And that wouldn’t be such a big deal if the girl was at all decent at acting, but she seems to have about as much depth on screen as her life decisions have had in reality.  And speaking Tom Cruise and Scientology, having her on screen is simply too incredibly distracting for me; I can’t stop thinking: “That poor, poor girl.”

Imagine the pleasant surprise I had today when I read the bottom of The Dark Knight movie poster and discovered- NO KATIE HOLMES! Could it be?  What about her character?  But yes, it is true- they have replaced Katie with Maggie Gyllenhaal.  You know, Will Ferrell’s love interest in Stranger Than Fiction.  Jake Gyllenhaal’s sister, apparently.

And so now I am much more excited about this movie, especially because of the rest of the talent listed on the bottom of that poster: Christian Bale, Michael Caine, Heath Ledger, Gary Oldman, Morgan Freeman…  I can think of at least 25 films with these names which I enjoy thoroughly.

But probably the most important name on that one-sheet is Chris Nolan.  It is worth getting revved up for the work of the man who made Memento.

Hercules!

April 24, 2008

The previously posted story regarding Amy Adams can be disregarded.  Hercules made an honest mistake this morning, and mistook the name of Amy Adams for Amy Ryan.  There is a big difference, as you can see:

And to make matters worse, the story posted on AICN has been edited so that it looks as if it specifically said it was NOT Adams making an appearance, and I look like an idiot. But I swear to all, it originally said it would be Ms. Adams.  Dash it all, Herc, be a little more careful next time.

Amy Adams Anonymous

April 24, 2008

I need to start a group or something.  AA.. um.. A? But that’d be triple A. And that’s taken.

I’ll keep working on it.

In the meantime, I’m pleased to announce that Herc over at AICN has just reported that Ms. Adams will be appearing on the upcoming season finale of The Office, presumably reprising her role as “Hot Girl”.

What will happen?  The word is there will be an engagement on the season finale- not hard to guess which two officers (officers! see what I did there? funny!) are likely to enter into marital bliss.  However, what hijinx will ensue when one of Jim’s old flames shows up??

I’m such a ridiculous tv addicted American… somebody somewhere, please, find me a life to live, because I certainly am not doing much with mine.

Ah, that’s the question isn’t it?

April 22, 2008

Or rather, these are the questions:

People have been wrestling with these same questions for centuries, and I of course don’t claim to have all the answers. There are volumes of books written about them, and I suppose all explanations would be called “rationalizations” by the maker of the video. After watching it, I suddenly realized that I only had a vague idea of what, exactly, a rationalization is. So I did what all “college educated professionals” (yuk yuk yuk) would do. I looked it up:

ra·tion·al·ize

v. ra·tion·al·ized, ra·tion·al·iz·ing, ra·tion·al·iz·es
v.tr.

1. To make rational.
2. To interpret from a rational standpoint.
3. To devise self-satisfying but incorrect reasons for (one’s behavior): “Many shoppers still rationalize luxury purchases as investments” Janice Castro.

Now it is obvious which definition of rationalize is meant by the video (#3), however let me point out something here which has some bearing on the whole affair: a rationalization is in the eye of the beholder. What is rational to one person may be complete nonsense to another, and the only way to determine whether an argument is a rationalization is to base this determination on the things one already knows to be true, or one’s presuppositions. By labeling all arguments contrary to his assertion that “God is imaginary” as absurd, the video creator is involved in circular reasoning of the following variety: essentially he is saying it is absurd to give an answer to the question “Why won’t God heal amputees?” because all such explanations are rationalizations. He is presupposing that God is imaginary before announcing his conclusion- something a “college educated professional” (translation: if you don’t agree with me you’re stupid) ought to know will lead to error. Observe the following syllogism:

  1. All arguments based on rationalizations lead to invalid conclusions.
  2. Any answer to the question “Why won’t God heal amputees?” other than “God is imaginary” is a rationalization.
  3. Therefore, “God is imaginary” is the only valid conclusion.
This is the logical fallacy of Begging the Question, or assuming your conclusion is true (statement 2) before reaching it (statement 3). In addition, statement #1 is not even true on its face: an argument’s validity is dependent on its truth value, not on from where it came.
Now gentle reader, please humor me and have another look at definition #1 for rationalization. Since we have established that the video maker’s reasoning is decidedly IRRATIONAL, shall we proceed with some rationalization (definition 1!)?
I stated before that rationalization is in the eye of the beholder, and based on presuppositions. I am more than willing to admit my relevant presuppositions before I begin an argument. They are:
  1. There was a man who lived in 1st century Israel called Yeshua (Jesus) who was unjustly executed by the Roman authorities.
  2. There is overwhelming historical evidence that the gospels of the NT ought to be considered as accurate depictions of his life and words.
  3. There is overwhelming evidence even independent of these gospels that he rose from the dead.
I’m not going to bother addressing each of the 10 questions raised in the video. I have my answers of course, I mean every “college educated professional” (blah!) must think about these things. I will point out again that the video maker is not being honest. This is not because he has presuppositions, but because he is pretending that his reasoning is completely independent of these presuppositions.

No, instead I would simply like to ask in regard to those presuppositions: what does the maker of the video do with Jesus? How does a man rising from the dead after 3 days in a grave square with the statement “God is imaginary?” If you can answer me that, then I will tell you why God does not heal amputees (even though he did- lepers and so forth, with fingers missing, etc. In front of people. It was written down. By 4 men, all 4 of whom were tortured over and over because they wouldn’t admit they made it all up).

A quick note about the “college educated professional” stuff: I am convinced nowadays, having spent time among the college educated and the non college educated, that a college education by and large actually has a deleterious effect on one’s center of reasoning.

The Wisdom of Dwight K. Schrute

April 17, 2008

The Office is probably the funniest thing on tv right now, and Dwight Schrute is the funniest thing about The Office. Consider:

Women are like wolves. If you want a wolf, you have to trap it. Snare it. Then to keep it happy, you have to tame it. Feed it, care for it. Lovingly. The way an animal deserves. And my animal deserves a lot of loving.

Reject a woman, and she will never let it go. One of the many defects of their kind. Also, weak arms.

A hero kills people, people that wish him harm. A hero is part human and part supernatural. A hero is born out of a childhood trauma, or out of a disaster, that must be avenged.

Through concentration, I can raise and lower my cholesterol at will.

When I die. I want to be frozen. And if they have to freeze me in pieces, so be it. I will wake up stronger than ever, because I will have used that time, to figure out exactly why I died. And what moves I could have used to defend myself better now that I know what hold he had me in.

Every time I’m about to do something, I ask myself, “Would an idiot do this?” If the answer is yes, I don’t do it.

Schrutes produce very thirsty babies.

A 30-year mortgage at Michael’s age essentially means that he’s buying a coffin. If I were buying my coffin, I would get one with thicker walls so you couldn’t hear the other dead people.

There are several ways to tell if a perp is lying. The liar will avoid direct eye contact. The liar will cover part of his or her face with his hand, especially the mouth. The liar will perspire. Unfortunately I spoke to Oscar on the phone so none of this is useful.

I know everything about film. I’ve seen over 240 of them.

The Japanese camp guards of World War Two always chose one man to kill whenever a batch of new prisoners arrived. I always wondered how they chose the man who was to die. I think I would have been good at choosing the person.

Why tip someone for a job I’m capable of doing myself? I can deliver food. I can drive a taxi. I can, and do, cut my own hair. I did however, tip my urologist, because I am unable to pulverize my own kidney stones.

Taxes

April 17, 2008

2 days have passed since April 15th, but I’m still thinking about taxes. I am poor. I don’t pay jack in taxes. As a matter of fact, I received a letter in the mail from the IRS last summer telling me they wanted to send me more money… I am totally serious. Apparently, I was eligible for the Earned Income Credit- a system by which the government actually gives a person more money than they paid in taxes that year. It’s like spending a dollar for a 50 cent hot dog, and getting $2 back in change. The government doesn’t have money- it gets all of its money from citizens, so that means this extra money is coming directly out of the pockets of people who worked hard enough to earn more- which means the EIC is nothing more than a mechanism for the redistribution of wealth. It’s socialism by definition. That’s not really meant to be a pejorative, it’s just a descriptor. It’s interesting that people don’t seem to like being called socialist, or even liberal nowadays- they prefer progressive. I have a newsflash for those people, though:

There is absolutely nothing progressive about taking more money from people who work the hardest.

I believe I have some credibility on this. I come from the definition of a lower to middling middle-class family. Neither parents went to college. I am only aware of 2 relatives who attended college: an aunt who went back in her 40s, and a cousin who now drives a truck. My stepmother’s family is slightly more educated, but it would be hard to describe any part of my family as having ever had anything other than a modest income. There are no trust funds, no significant investments, no nest eggs.

So it should carry at least a little weight when I say to the federal government: we don’t want other people’s damn money. Now I am not stupid, and as I said a few months ago I do not consider it inconsistent to go ahead and take whatever I am offered, from whatever source it may come- government education grants included. There is a difference between the way principles are applied in the micro and macro, and in the micro if I am offered extra money, I am going to take it because there is very little I can do in the macro to make the government give money back to whom it belongs.

I wonder how many people reading this haven’t yet heard of the Fair Tax. It’s a terrible name- it ought to simply be called the Consumption Tax or Income Tax Replacement system or something more descriptive. It’s probably the most important economic idea out there right now, with more potential to revolutionize the United States economy than anything in history. Here’s a rundown of the idea:

  1. Repeal the 16th amendment to the Constitution.

    This is the amendment which makes is legal for Congess to tax income. After it is repealed, there will be no constitutional basis on which Congress could enact both and income tax AND sales tax (something which they could do now if they wanted!).

  2. Abolish the IRS.

    The IRS costs billions of dollars a year to operate. It would have to be replaced of course, but the replacement would be much cheaper and slimmer. The IRS monitors something in the 100 millions range of tax paying entities (individuals AND businesses)- the replacement bureau would only exists to send people their rebate checks, and to collect the sales tax from businesses when it’s charged at the register- something businesses currently do just fine in all the states with state sales tax anyway. So no big deal. Also, there is something like $3 billion spent each year by people just to DO their taxes- this money would be put to more productive means, such as investing for the future or running a business, or just buying groceries.

  3. End all federal payroll taxes.

    Income tax, FICA, social security, medicare and all other federal taxes will not be taken out of paychecks, and instead funded by the consumption tax. Your take home income instantly increases by 30-60%, depending on how much you currently earn. Just have a look at your check and figure up what it would be with federal taxes put back in. And by the way, your employer has to pay 7.5% of your check out of his pocket, too- which really means it comes out of your pocket. So you will actually see an even GREATER increase.

  4. End all taxes on businesses, investments, or any other income determined taxes.

    This is probably the most important principle to understand in the proposal, but also the hardest to get a grasp on. I’ll make it very simple. Let’s say you start a hot dog business. People love your hot dogs, and you sold 50,000 last year for $2 a piece- not bad! Now, 25 cents of each hot dog goes to buying from your supplier, 50 cents to pay your workers, and 25 cents to pay for your little stand. Which leaves you a $1 per hot dog- or $50,000- profit. Being the first time you’ve ever run a business, you didn’t think about paying the taxes on your business until April comes around… oops. You realize the government is going to demand around 20% of your profit, which leaves you with only $40,000 left. Darn. Well, you really liked making $50,000, and you think people would pay more for your wonderful hot dogs, so what are you going to do next year? That’s right- you’re going to raise your hot dog prices to generate an extra $10,000- so you are now going to charge $2.20 per hot dog, and make your customers pay the taxes for you. This is not because you are an evil person- it is because you are a smart person. This is what businesses do every day- when you buy anything from tires to earrings, YOU are paying the taxes, not them. If their taxes disappear, the prices you pay for goods will drop. So not only will your income increase, the prices you pay for goods will decrease.

    One more point about this- if you own a business in Italy where you are paying taxes on your business, and you could conceivably run this business in the US, and the US repealed all taxes on businesses, wouldn’t you move your business from Italy to the US? Of course. And that’s what 80% of overseas corporations said they would do in a formal survey given to them a couple years ago. This alone would bring in hundreds of billions of new dollars into the American economy- not to mention new jobs, more competition and innovation, and therefore lower prices.

  5. Replace these taxes with a 23% sales tax on all goods and services.

    According to numerous studies done by economists, this 23% rate will generate the same amount of money the government currently takes in- it is neither a tax increase nor a decrease. The only thing that changes is the mechanism. You’ll hear elsewhere on the internet or the news that the 23% tax rate is a lie and that it’s actually 30%. The truth is, both are correct- it’s just a difference in how it is calculated. I’d walk through the calculations but it’s more important just to realize that no one is trying to be misleading here- if you are in the 30% income tax bracket now, the number to compare the tax rate to under the consumption tax would be 23% and not 30%. Another important aspect of this to note is that, currently, there are millions of cheaters in the underground cash economy that do not pay income taxes, such as drug dealers, prostitutes, illegal immigrants etc. All of these people buy things, and this underground economy- which is estimated to be at least $2 TRILLION a year of untaxed income- would be a source of new revenue for the government. In the previous point, I asserted prices will drop because businesses are not paying taxes. The sales tax added on to these lower prices would cause the total you pay for, say, a new car to be relatively close to what you are now paying. But remember, you have an increase in purchasing power due to taxes not being taken out of your check, and receiving a monthly rebate check- my next point.

  6. Everyone receives a monthly rebate check on taxes paid for necessities.

    This check will be in the neighborhood of $200-500 per person (rough figures there- doing the math off the top of my head). This means that people who only spend money on necessities do not pay any federal taxes, which is the same as the current system. For example, I did not end up paying any taxes this year or last year because my income was too low- everything taken out of my paycheck was sent back to me as a tax refund. Instead of a tax refund, everyone would receive a monthly rebate check in addition to keeping your entire check. If you spent more in taxes than what you receive back in the rebate check, that is your net paid tax. Naturally, rich people spend much more money, and will therefore pay much more in taxes. If you spend even less on taxes than your rebate check, than you are getting the equivalent of an Earned Income Credit, like I received last year. So that should keep the socialists happy.

But probably the most important point about the Fair Tax: it would transform April 15th into just a normal, beautiful spring day. However, if I had my way, it would become known as Freedom Day- commemorating our liberation from an archaic tax system that penalizes productivity and rewards laziness.

That’s it. Any questions?

You believe what you sing

April 13, 2008

After returning home victoriously from a rather diverting game of Puerto Rico followed by an unsuccessful go at Settlers of Catan this evening, I found myself pondering (completely randomly) how much (little?) thought seems to go into the lyrics of modern worship songs sung in churches. I discovered a rather entertaining (to me) blog with lots of good links critiquing such things:

http://badlyricsmakebadtheology.blogspot.com/

I just did a cursory perusal of this one and it doesn’t seem to be done out of a self-important attitude, just a simple desire for music to be grounded in solid theology. However, I will say a couple of the posts seem a little nit-picky even for me:

Why do we “need” Jesus?

We believe in God / and we all need Jesus
‘Cause life is hard / and it might not get easier

I guess I might have trouble meriting heaven by myself, so I need help of some sort from Jesus. In this song, is he my savior, or my example or friend or therapist or life coach or what??

Overly obsessive attention to nuance notwithstanding, I do agree with the author’s general sentiment: that bad lyrics make for bad theology. Another way of putting it might be, similar to “you are what you eat”, you believe what you sing.

Rabbit Trail: Peruse is one of a small list of words in English which has two definitions, one being the opposite of the other. Peruse may mean a detailed investigation, or it can also mean a quick overview. Another word which has two opposite meanings is cleave; two things may cleave together, e.g. a man will cleave to his wife, or you can cleave a melon in half; interestingly enough, one cannot “uncleave” or “decleave” a melon. I’m sure there are other ones but I can’t think of any right now. Anyway.

Regarding bad theology of worship music, one song that has always bugged me to death is this one by Shane Barnard:

You said “Ask and you will receive”
Whatever you need
You Said “Pray and I’ll hear from heaven and I’ll heal your land”

You said, Your glory will fill the earth like water to seas
You said “Lift up your eyes the harvest is here the kingdom is near”

You said ask and I’ll give the nations to you
Oh Lord, thats the cry of my heart
Distant shores and the islands will see your light
as it rises on us

You said “Ask and you will receive”
Whatever you need
You Said “Pray and I’ll hear from heaven and I’ll heal your land”

You said, Your glory will fill the earth
like water to seas
You said “Lift up your eyes the harvest is here the kingdom is near”

You said ask and I’ll give the nations to you
Oh Lord, thats the cry of my heart
Distant shores and the islands will see your light
as it rises on us

Ask and I’ll give the nations to you
Oh Lord, thats the cry of my heart
Distant shores and the islands will see your light
as it rises on earth

This song is a smattering of different scriptures from all over the Bible- some of which aren’t even translated right, being paraphrases- which when put together paint a really distorted picture of God’s work on Earth through the Church, the prospects of success and failure of that work, topped off by a rosy, puppy dogs and ice cream view of the end result of it all. And to make things worse, it completely disregards the intended meaning behind the scriptures it seemingly elucidates.. it is riddle with exegetical error.

For one thing, Habbakuk 2:14 (a notoriously misconstrued verse which in my experience has been purported to mean anything from universalism to predestination to premillenial-dispensationalism) does not have anything to do with the gospel of Jesus Christ going out to all the nations. It’s about a specific incident of God’s wrath poured out on idol worshipers causing the nations around them to repent. Read the context, people:

Hab 2:12 “Woe to him who builds a city with bloodshed And founds a town with violence!
Hab 2:13 “Is it not indeed from the LORD of hosts That peoples toil for fire, And nations grow weary for nothing?
Hab 2:14 “For the earth will be filled With the knowledge of the glory of the LORD, As the waters cover the sea.
Hab 2:15 “Woe to you who make your neighbors drink, Who mix in your venom even to make {them} drunk So as to look on their nakedness!
Hab 2:16 “You will be filled with disgrace rather than honor. Now you yourself drink and expose your {own} nakedness. The cup in the LORD’S right hand will come around to you, And utter disgrace {will come} upon your glory.
Hab 2:17 “For the violence done to Lebanon will overwhelm you, And the devastation of {its} beasts by which you terrified them, Because of human bloodshed and violence done to the land, To the town and all its inhabitants.
Hab 2:18 “What profit is the idol when its maker has carved it, {Or} an image, a teacher of falsehood? For {its} maker trusts in his {own} handiwork When he fashions speechless idols.
Hab 2:19 “Woe to him who says to a {piece of} wood, ‘Awake!’ To a mute stone, ‘Arise!’ {And} that is {your} teacher? Behold, it is overlaid with gold and silver, And there is no breath at all inside it.
Hab 2:20 “But the LORD is in His holy temple. Let all the earth be silent before Him.”

People might argue that this incident did not cause the knowledge of God’s glory to fill the Earth, but this is obviously prophetic/ apocalyptic language, examples of which are used throughout the Bible all the time. This is just one example the ridiculousness of this song. I could go on and on about it. And the sad thing is, I like the song- it’s really not bad as worship music goes- it’s just too bad the lyrics are so odiously distracting.

Is it too much to ask for theologically-sound Christian music to be sung in churches and para-church organizations? Am I being too demanding of our creative sisters and brothers? I don’t want to be a jerk or a party pooper.. really I don’t. I just think that putting what seems like zero effort into the meaning behind music lyrics ought to left to people who have nothing important to sing about.

What really worries me is that this casual attitude seems indicative of the general mode in much of the church toward theology and the study of scripture today- and it doesn’t seem isolated to one generation either. Maybe this has been the case for most of the last 2000 years and I shouldn’t get too hung up on it. But then again a relaxed adherence toward scriptural truth by even small groups of people contributed to the existence of such things as slavery, Nazism, the beginnings of Islam and Mormonism, and gnosticism.

I wouldn’t lay the responsibility of these unfortunate occurrences at the feet of Shane Barnard, Chris Tomlin or Amy Grant though. That’s just over the top. But it’s worth paying attention to such things.

Back

April 7, 2008

Unfortunately my little blog here was sort of gone for about a week due to issues with the domain name. For those that don’t know, the domain name is the thing up in your window there that says “silentplanet.org”. My ownership had expired (my bad) but instead of holding it for a few days for me to renew it like they were supposed to, my host sold it to someone else (their bad).

But they were nice about it and fixed the problem, and here we are again. All taken care of. And nothing to say.

[EDIT}

However, this is pretty cool: